On 09/02/2016 15:05, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2016-02-08 17:15+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>> Do for kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer and kvm_inject_pending_timer_irqs
>> what the other irq.c routines have been doing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
>> @@ -33,7 +33,10 @@
>> */
>> int kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> - return apic_has_pending_timer(vcpu);
>> + if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu))
>> + return apic_has_pending_timer(vcpu);
>> +
>> + return true;
>
> Apart from int/bool mismatch, it returned 0 before and that was correct.
>
So that means "return 0;" implies "Reviewed-by"? :)
Paolo
