On 2/1/16, Jeffrey Merkey <jeffmer...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/1/16, kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com> wrote: >> Hi Jeffrey, >> >> [auto build test WARNING on v4.5-rc2] >> [also build test WARNING on next-20160201] >> [cannot apply to tip/x86/core] >> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to >> help improving the system] >> >> url: >> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jeffrey-Merkey/Add-BUG_XX-debugging-options/20160202-040506 >> config: x86_64-randconfig-x012-201605 (attached as .config) >> reproduce: >> # save the attached .config to linux build tree >> make ARCH=x86_64 >> >> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> >> In file included from include/linux/bug.h:4:0, >> from include/linux/page-flags.h:9, >> from kernel/bounds.c:9: >>>> arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:14:5: warning: "CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG" is not >>>> defined [-Wundef] >> #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG >> ^ >> -- >> In file included from include/linux/bug.h:4:0, >> from include/linux/page-flags.h:9, >> from kernel/bounds.c:9: >>>> arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:14:5: warning: "CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG" is not >>>> defined [-Wundef] >> #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG >> ^ >> In file included from include/linux/bug.h:4:0, >> from include/linux/crypto.h:23, >> from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:8: >>>> arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:14:5: warning: "CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG" is not >>>> defined [-Wundef] >> #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG >> ^ >> >> vim +/CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG +14 arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h >> >> 1 #ifndef _ASM_X86_BUG_H >> 2 #define _ASM_X86_BUG_H >> 3 >> 4 #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG >> 5 >> 6 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE >> 7 >> 8 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 >> 9 # define __BUG_C0 "2:\t.long 1b, %c0\n" >> 10 #else >> 11 # define __BUG_C0 "2:\t.long 1b - 2b, %c0 - 2b\n" >> 12 #endif >> 13 >> > 14 #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG >> 15 #define BUG() >> \ >> 16 do { >> \ >> 17 asm volatile("int3"); >> \ >> 18 unreachable(); >> \ >> 19 } while (0) >> 20 #else >> 21 #define BUG() >> \ >> 22 do { >> \ >> >> --- >> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology >> Center >> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel >> Corporation >> > > > I am looking at this one, but I'm not sure what the point is of > running a test to build something where the defines are ignored. Is > this file off limits to use CONFIG options in the build? > > Jeff >
Never mind. I just found it. LOL :-) Jeff
