On Feb 01 2016 21:20, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org> wrote: > >>> I'm not sure how you're working out who to send these to but all these >>> reports you've been sending have been for ALSA core which I rarely look >>> at closely, I mostly look at ASoC. Might be worth looking into so >>> people don't start zoning out things that look like misdirected stuff >>> (I just noticed myself doing that with this). > >> I am using scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f the involved files. If it >> produces wrong results, please update MAINTAINERS. > > You should never rely on the output of get_maintainers without review, > it's prone to both false positives and false negatives. Given that > Sakamoto-san does not seem to appear in MAINTAINERS at all and you've > not managed to find Liam who's a comaintainer for all the ASoC stuff I > suspect you're doing this with --git enabled which is especially prone > to false positives since it tends to identify people who are just doing > global cleanup work and aren't particularly interested in a given file. > As far as I can tell this is how I'm getting pulled in too rather than > MAINTAINERS.
Aha. That's the reason I receive these messages. I've wondering why I receive them. Well, I don't mind to receive them because it's a good information for me to get current state of ALSA core functionality. If I had some spare time, I was also going to fix it. But currently I have little time for it due to my development for my minor hardwares... (Actually, Iwai-san posted patches to fix them at incredibly pace. I can't follow his pace, because I'm working for ALSA in my free time.) Regards Takashi Sakamoto
