On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > ----- On Jan 27, 2016, at 12:22 PM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de > > wrote: > > Sounds fair. What is the recommended typing for "ptr" then ? > > uint32_t ** or uint32_t * ? > > > > It would be expected to pass a "uint32_t *" for the set > > operation, but the "get" operation requires a "uint32_t **". > > Well, you can't change the types depending on the opcode, so you need to stick > with **.
Alternatively you make it: (opcode, *newptr, **oldptr, flags);
