On 25/01/2016 13:26, Wu, Feng wrote: >> > It may be necessary because IRTE writes (128 bits) are not atomic. > IRTE is updated atomically, I added the patch to support this. Please > refer to 344cb4e0b6f3a0dbef0643eacb4946338eb228c0.
Great, I hadn't noticed that patch. Thanks. Paolo
