Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last
policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last
primitive instead.

Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 78b1e2f..b3059a3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -67,11 +67,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct 
cpufreq_policy *policy,
 {
        lockdep_assert_held(&cpufreq_driver_lock);
        do {
-               policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
-
                /* No more policies in the list */
-               if (&policy->policy_list == &cpufreq_policy_list)
+               if (list_is_last(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list))
                        return NULL;
+
+               policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
        } while (!suitable_policy(policy, active));
 
        return policy;
-- 
1.9.3

Reply via email to