3.16.7-ckt23 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <l...@altlinux.org>

commit 2d33fa1059da4c8e816627a688d950b613ec0474 upstream.

According to arch/sh/kernel/syscalls_64.S and common sense, __NR_fgetxattr
has to be defined to 259, but it doesn't.  Instead, it's defined to 269,
which is of course used by another syscall, __NR_sched_setaffinity in this
case.

This bug was found by strace test suite.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <l...@altlinux.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriq...@canonical.com>
---
 arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h 
b/arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h
index e6820c86e8c7..47ebd5b5ed55 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
 #define __NR_fsetxattr         256
 #define __NR_getxattr          257
 #define __NR_lgetxattr         258
-#define __NR_fgetxattr         269
+#define __NR_fgetxattr         259
 #define __NR_listxattr         260
 #define __NR_llistxattr                261
 #define __NR_flistxattr                262

Reply via email to