On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Yao Yuan <yao.y...@nxp.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Han Xu < xhnj...@gmail.com > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Yuan Yao <yao.y...@freescale.com> wrote: >> > This patch set is used for add the fsl-quadspi support for ls1021a and >> > ls1043a, so remove the patch: >> > mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: extend support for some special requerment. >> >> Please use --cover-letter to generate cover letter. >> >> > >> > This patch will be send with anther patch set for add QSPI support on >> > LS2080A. >> > >> > All the new property are document in anther patch set which is already >> > send to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org and devicet...@vger.kernel.org. >> > Here is the patch name: >> > 0001-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-dspi-compa.patch >> > 0002-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-fsl-ls2080a-qspi-compa.patch >> > 0003-dts-ls2080a-update-the-DTS-for-QSPI-and-DSPI-support.patch >> > 0004-Documentation-fsl-quadspi-Add-optional-properties.patch >> > >> > Any extra information you can find them on the patchwork: >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078931/ >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078951/ >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8079091/ >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078941/ >> >> Please send all patches in one patch set, this is not acceptable. >> > > Thanks for your review. > But those patches are dts binding patch. And will send to > devicet...@vger.kernel.org and some corresponding maintainer. > > Those two patch sets will send to different mail-list and maintainers > separately. > > So, maybe it's better to send the patch to the maintainer accordingly and > thus I think can also reduce the workload of maintainer. > > How about your think?
Send the complete patch set to maintainer and cc all related sub-module groups, so everybody could understand the whole story. > Thanks. > > Yuan Yao.
