Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com> writes:
> On 20/01/16 16:10, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com> writes:
>>
>>>> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &ctl))
>>>> + panic("%s: failed to get reg base", node->name);
>>>> +
>>>> + chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + chip->ctl = ctl;
>>>> + chip->base = base;
>>
>> As I said before, this assumes the outer DT node uses a ranges
>> property. Normally reg properties work the same whether they specify an
>> offset within an outer "ranges" or have a full address directly. It
>> would be easy enough to make this work with either, so I don't see any
>> reason not to.
>
> Yup, that is a good point. I guess Marc can address this in the next
> round, since we need a DT binding anyway.
I'd suggest using of_address_to_resource() on both nodes and subtracting
the start addresses returned.
--
Måns Rullgård
