>> Can you accept the proposed changes around the affected memory allocations? > > Just leave it as-is if there is no reason.
I suggest to make the implementation of the function "mgc_process_recover_log" a bit more efficient. >> Do you prefer to stash any changes together for a bigger update step? > > Yes. Patches 5 and 6 would be easier to review if they were folded into > one patch. I do not like patch squashing for my update suggestions here. Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
