On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:37:09PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2015-10-13 21:07:00, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This is exactly the sort of use case this feature is intended for, and > > is the sort of situation where a custom kernel is not going to be any > > kind of practical problem. > Well.. we support iopl(0) and we have /dev/mem. I don't see how this > is different. It's not clear to me that those are especially good ideas that we want to encourage people to use.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
