On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 10:43 -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
> On 11/20/2015 10:19 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 20-11-15, 10:10, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> >>>> limits->max_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits->max_policy_pct, 0
> >>>> , 100);
> >>>
> >>> And put this after the later one ?
> >>>
> >>>> + limits->max_policy_pct = DIV_ROUND_UP(policy->max * 100,
> >>>> + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> >>>>
> >>>> /* Normalize user input to [min_policy_pct, max_policy_pct] */
> >>>> limits->min_perf_pct = max(limits->min_policy_pct,
> >>>
> >>> Sure you tested it ? :)
> >>
> >> Oops -- and yeah, tested. It works because I rewrite the value of
> >> max_policy_pct :). I'll repost shortly.
> >
> > But we aren't doing below anymore, doesn't this change the
> > calculations at all?
> >
> > limits->max_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits->max_policy_pct, 0 , 100);
>
> The clamp only confines the max_policy between 0 and 100. AFAIK it doesn't
> make
> any change tothe value of limits->max_policy_pct unless it was outside of that
> range.
>
> P.
> >
With the changes below (as suggested above), I did tests. Except two
cases, it did correct. Those two are in turbo range, so I am OK with
that.
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index b78abe9..c3bcca4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -1111,9 +1111,9 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct
cpufreq_policy *policy)
limits = &powersave_limits;
limits->min_policy_pct = (policy->min * 100) /
policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
limits->min_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits->min_policy_pct, 0 ,
100);
- limits->max_policy_pct = (policy->max * 100) /
policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
+ limits->max_policy_pct = DIV_ROUND_UP(policy->max * 100,
+ policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
limits->max_policy_pct = clamp_t(int, limits->max_policy_pct, 0 ,
100);
-
/* Normalize user input to [min_policy_pct, max_policy_pct] */
limits->min_perf_pct = max(limits->min_policy_pct,
limits->min_sysfs_pct);
@@ -1131,7 +1131,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct
cpufreq_policy *policy)
int_tofp(100));
limits->max_perf = div_fp(int_tofp(limits->max_perf_pct),
int_tofp(100));
-
+ limits->max_perf = round_up(limits->max_perf, 8);
if (hwp_active)
intel_pstate_hwp_set();
3300 : OK
3200 : 1 less
3100 : 1 less
3000 : 1 less
2900 : OK
2800 : OK
2700 : OK
2600 : OK
2500 : OK
2400 : OK
2300 : OK
2200 : OK
2100 : OK
2000 : OK
1900 : OK
1800 : OK
1700 : OK
1600 : OK
1500 : OK
1400 : OK
1300 : OK
1200 : OK
1100 : OK
1000 : OK
900 : OK
800 : OK
Thanks,
Srinivas
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
