On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, David Howells wrote: > > Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't otherwise support it. > This assuming that the arch doesn't have support SMP without providing its own > cmpxchg() implementation.
This is too ugly to live. At least the kernel/workqueue.c part. The requirement that everybody implement a workable cmpxchg (and falling back to spinlocks if required as per the atomic bit operations) looks ok, but don't show that in generic code. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/