On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:28:09 -0800
Mark Fasheh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> >     if (vfsmnt->mnt_flags & MNT_RELATIME) {
> > -           if ((timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_mtime) < 0) ||
> > -               (timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_ctime) < 0))
> > +           if ((timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_mtime) <= 0) ||
> > +               (timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_ctime) <= 0))
> >                     return 1;
> Hmm, should we fix up touch_atime() to use "<=" as well? Maybe I didn't read
> it correctly...

The logic I have there is the same (I hope)...

+                       if (timespec_compare(&inode->i_mtime,
+                                               &inode->i_atime) < 0 &&
+                           timespec_compare(&inode->i_ctime,
+                                               &inode->i_atime) < 0)
+                               return;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to