On 11/5/2015 1:07 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
OK, I didn't know that we had such a macro. To make this look like the other
>macro, I can do this.
>
>static inline u64 mult_frac64(u64 x, u32 numer, u32 denom)
>{
> u64 quot;
> u64 rem = x % denom;
> u64 rem2;
>
> quot = x;
> do_div(quot, denom);
>
> rem2 = rem * numer;
> do_div(rem2, denom);
>
> return (quot * numer) + rem2;
>}
Might be I did a wrong smaple, but do_div() returns two values actually.
You perhaps overlooked it and thus wrote something redundant above.
OK, I was looking at example usages in the kernel. The ones I looked
always used the first argument as an input & output parameter. I got
nervous about overwriting something.
void __ndelay(unsigned long long nsecs)
{
u64 end;
nsecs <<= 9;
do_div(nsecs, 125);
...
}
Let's try again.
static inline u64 mult_frac64(u64 x, u32 numer, u32 denom) {
u64 rem = x % denom;
u64 quot = do_div(x, denom);
u64 mul = rem * numer;
return (quot * numer) + do_div(mul, denom);
}
I'll do a s/MULDIV/mult_frac64/g to address Timur's concern.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
