* Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:48:50PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Linus Torvalds
> > > <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think I'll pull this, but then just make a separate commit to remove
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > > > all the bogus games with "control" dependencies that seem to have no 
> > > > basis is 
> > > > reality.
> > > 
> > > So the attached is what I committed in my tree. [...]
> > 
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> > 
> > > +      dependency into nonexistence.  Careful use of READ_ONCE() or
> > > +      atomic{,64}_read() can help to preserve your control dependency.
> > > +      Please see the Compiler Barrier section for more information.
> > 
> > So technically it's the "COMPILER BARRIER" section, but this is a 
> > pre-existing 
> > formulation and the document doesn't use such references consistently so I 
> > guess 
> > it doesn't matter much.
> 
> I will take a pass through and fix these up.  I don't see this as urgent,
> so will add it to my patches for the next merge window.

Sounds good to me!

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to