* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:54:47PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:34:46AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> > > On 10/19/15 2:04 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > >@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static void __bench_mem_routine(struct
> > > >bench_mem_info *info, int r_idx, size_t l
> > > > double result_bps = 0.0;
> > > > u64 result_cycles = 0;
> > > >
> > > >- printf("Routine %s (%s)\n", r->name, r->desc);
> > > >+ printf("routine %s (%s)\n", r->name, r->desc);
> > > >
> > > > if (bench_format == BENCH_FORMAT_DEFAULT)
> > > > printf("# Copying %s Bytes ...\n\n", length_str);
> > >
> > > Seems like 'R' is more appropriate here.
> >
> > Right, changed it.
>
> And then, he does that on a later patch, duh.
Yeah, indeed - I messed that up: tried to introduce __unused but noticed during
development and testing on other distros that '__unused' is way too crowded a
namespace (various fields in random headers are named like that), so after a
bit
of a fight with those headers I changed it back to __maybe_unused ... but the
original change slipped into the series.
Do you want me to resend the series to fix this and the other problems David
and
you noticed?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
