So I'm working towards adding more 'perf bench' benchmarks and found
a few rough edges - fixed by the series below.

Thanks,

     Ingo

Ingo Molnar (14):
  perf/bench: Improve the 'perf bench mem memcpy' code readability
  perf/bench: Default to all routines in 'perf bench mem'
  perf/bench: Eliminate unused argument from bench_mem_common()
  perf/bench: Rename 'mem-memcpy.c' => 'mem-functions.c'
  perf/bench: Remove the prefaulting complication from 'perf bench mem mem*'
  perf/bench: List output formatting options on 'perf bench -h'
  perf/bench/mem: Change 'cycle' to 'cycles'
  perf/bench/mem: Rename 'routine' to 'routine_str'
  perf/bench/mem: Fix 'length' vs. 'size' naming confusion
  perf/bench/mem: Improve user visible strings
  perf/bench/mem: Reorganize the code a bit
  perf/bench: Harmonize all the -l/--nr_loops options
  perf/bench/mem: Rename 'routine' to 'function'
  perf/bench: Run benchmarks, don't test them

 tools/perf/bench/Build             |   2 +-
 tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c   | 379 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy.c      | 434 
---------------------------------------------------------
 tools/perf/bench/numa.c            |   4 +-
 tools/perf/bench/sched-messaging.c |  10 +-
 tools/perf/builtin-bench.c         |  14 +-
 6 files changed, 394 insertions(+), 449 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/bench/mem-functions.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/perf/bench/mem-memcpy.c

-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to