Alexander Viro wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > > > :%s/have/doesn't have/gc > > > > > > ??? Why the hell do you want a global replacement? > > > > not global replace, global CONFIRM. Just in case the > > Ugh. If you want to be pedantic that's G1:/have/s//doesn't &^M You got me on that one.... :-) Jeff > for you. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Erik Andersen
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Phil Randal
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Linus Torvalds
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Martin Dalecki
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Martin Dalecki
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey