On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > > :%s/have/doesn't have/gc > > > > ??? Why the hell do you want a global replacement? > > not global replace, global CONFIRM. Just in case the Ugh. If you want to be pedantic that's G1:/have/s//doesn't &^M for you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Erik Andersen
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Phil Randal
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Linus Torvalds
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Martin Dalecki
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Martin Dalecki
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey