On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > OTOH, block-dev readahead makes sense for filesystems where > the packing locality is close to the access pattern BUT NOT > close to anything the page cache would recognise as being > close. I dunno. The main reason I'd like to get the block devices into the page cache is that right now there is no way to mmap them - something that can potentially be _very_ useful, regardless of readahead. And quite frankly, the generic file readahead has been pounded upon and tested a lot more than the block device read-ahead ever was. I bet it performs better if for no other reason. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Martin Dalecki
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Rik van Riel
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Martin Dalecki
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff Garzik
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Linus Torvalds
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Ingo Oeser
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Rik van Riel
- [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Linus Torvalds
- [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killing re... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro