On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> OTOH, block-dev readahead makes sense for filesystems where
> the packing locality is close to the access pattern BUT NOT
> close to anything the page cache would recognise as being
> close.
I dunno. The main reason I'd like to get the block devices into the page
cache is that right now there is no way to mmap them - something that can
potentially be _very_ useful, regardless of readahead.
And quite frankly, the generic file readahead has been pounded upon and
tested a lot more than the block device read-ahead ever was. I bet it
performs better if for no other reason.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Martin Dalecki
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Rik van Riel
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Martin Dalecki
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff Garzik
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Linus Torvalds
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Ingo Oeser
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Rik van Riel
- [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Linus Torvalds
- [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killing re... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Alexander Viro

