On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> I agree with you and Rik that this array needs to go away... but
> ripping out the feature is not the answer, IMHO.
Actually, the _real_ answer is to make fs/block_dev.c use the page cache
instead - and generic_file_read() does read-ahead that actually improves
performance, unlike the silly contortions that the direct block-dev
read-ahead tries to do.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Martin Dalecki
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Rik van Riel
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Martin Dalecki
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff Garzik
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Linus Torvalds
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Ingo Oeser
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Rik van Riel
- Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead[] Linus Torvalds
- [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killing read_ahead... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killing re... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: [PATCH] Re: PATCH: killin... Rik van Riel

