David S. Miller wrote: > How about first finding out why their buggy JRE detects whether an > address is local by trying to bind() to it :-) I don't know why the JRE does it, but I've seen that sort of thing used to decide whether to try X shared memory. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses kuznet
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Christoph Rohland
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alan Cox
- RE: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Schwartz
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alberto Bertogli
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Jamie Lokier
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local address... Horst von Brand
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Jamie Lokier
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses H. Peter Anvin
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local address... David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-loca... David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-... Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-... Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-... David S. Miller