Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 17:20:22 -0600 From: Matt Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Assuming that my "compatibility argument" is not considered valid. What I really need is some good ammunition for going back to Sun to ask them to change the JRE spec -- like some significant kernel features or Linux applications that relies on this new bind() behavior. How about first finding out why their buggy JRE detects whether an address is local by trying to bind() to it :-) Really, when an application feeds a specific address into bind() it must have good reason for selecting it. All I want to know in this specific instance, is why Sun's JRE is sending non-local addresses into bind(), that's all. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses kuznet
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Christoph Rohland
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alan Cox
- RE: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Schwartz
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alberto Bertogli
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Jamie Lokier
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local address... Horst von Brand
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Jamie Lokier
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses H. Peter Anvin
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local address... David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-loca... David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-... Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-... Andi Kleen