Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler

[Ingo Molnar]

On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > yes. Please remove the above part.
> 
> OK, done.

thanks - i think all the other heuristics are 'fair': processes with more
CPU and run time used are likely to be more important, superuser processes
and direct-hw-access processes ditto.

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/