On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Marco Colombo wrote: > [...] > > They are niced because the user thinks them a bit less > > important. > > Please don't, this assumption is quite wrong. I use nice just to be > 'nice' to other users. I can run my *important* CPU hog simulation > nice +10 in order to let other people get more CPU when the need it. yep. The OOM killer heuristics *must not* penalize any other kernel feature. Rather introduce a orthogonal voluntary "importance" system-call, which marks processes as more and less important. This is similar to priority, it can only be decreased by ordinary users. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Byron Stanoszek
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM han... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM... Marco Colombo
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Byron Stanoszek
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Kurt Garloff
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-te... David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 ... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-te... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 ... Dmitry Pogosyan
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 ... David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 ... Marco Colombo
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM han... David Weinehall
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM... David Weinehall
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM han... Andrea Arcangeli