On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 07:22:48PM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote: > That instruction loads the _value_ of p. I.e. reads the memory from > location 0x80495a4 into %eax. The source instruction was: > > movl p,%eax > > The instructions that you're thinking of, that load fixed addresses, > look like these: > > mov $0x80495a4,%eax > lea 0x80495a4,%eax > > or in source form: > > movl $p,%eax > leal p,%eax Thanks for noticing my error. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint John Wehle
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constrai... Jamie Lokier
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm cons... Richard Henderson
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm cons... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint John Wehle
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constrai... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm cons... David Howells
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint John Wehle
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constrai... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm cons... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: GCC proposal for "@"... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@&q... Linus Torvalds