> The reload of the address of `p' isn't necessary and gcc is wrong in > generating it. p is a constant embedded into the .text section ... It's perhaps not optimal, however I'm not sure that it's wrong. In any case if you can supply a small standalone test case (i.e. preprocessed source code) I'll take a quick look at things. I take it that you haven't tried the current gcc sources? -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint John Wehle
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constrai... Jamie Lokier
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm cons... Richard Henderson
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm cons... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint John Wehle
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constrai... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm cons... David Howells
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint John Wehle
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constrai... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm cons... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: GCC proposal for "@"... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@&q... Linus Torvalds
- Re: GCC proposal for "... Andrea Arcangeli