On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > It's ok for the compiler to do that (given we don't know what "volatile" > means anyway :-). But it does have implications for spin_lock: > spin_lock must say that it clobbers memory. Yup. We should just fix that. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and othe... Jamie Lokier
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other sm... Linus Torvalds
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and othe... Jamie Lokier
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fix... Linus Torvalds
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other sm... Jamie Lokier
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and othe... Linus Torvalds
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and othe... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and ... David Woodhouse
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fix... kuznet
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other sm... Andrea Arcangeli
- GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Jamie Lokier
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm const... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm c... Linus Torvalds