On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > I think we can remove all the __dummy stuff and put the "memory" in such asm > statements. > > Comments? Have you looked at the code it generates? Quite sad, really. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and oth... Linus Torvalds
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and oth... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and... Jamie Lokier
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and... David Woodhouse
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fi... kuznet
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other s... Andrea Arcangeli
- GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Jamie Lokier
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm cons... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other s... Jamie Lokier
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and oth... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and... Jamie Lokier
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and... Juan J. Quintela
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and oth... kuznet
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and... Richard Henderson
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory... Richard Henderson