On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 11:50:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Another problem is that bitkeeper has not been through a security audit. Maybe, but i like the fact that BitKeeper uses ssh by default for transmitting data. -- Nathan Paul Simons, Programmer for FSMLabs http://www.fsmlabs.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System David S. Miller
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System Daniel Quinlan
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management Sy... David S. Miller
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Managemen... Daniel Quinlan
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Manag... David S. Miller
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch ... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... David Lang
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Alan Cox
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Nathan Paul Simons
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Alan Cox
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Nathan Paul Simons
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... almesber
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Richard Gooch
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Russell King
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Richard Gooch
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... David S. Miller
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Alan Cox
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Managemen... Erik Andersen
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System Theodore Y. Ts'o