Re: Linux kernel modules development in C++

[Igmar Palsenberg]

> Oh, I understand why #2 is necessary, that doesn't mean that I don't hear
> people complain about it anyway.  On a side note, I consider lack of a real
> kernel debugger to be evidence for #1.  But I don't want to kick that dead
> horse again.

Well, I'm one of those guys who never uses debuggers :)

> > I'd be a bit more careful. It is in large part those "completely
> > ridiculous, nobody will ever be able to write decent software that way"
> > whims that got Linux to where it stands today.
> 
> Very true!


        Regards,

                Igmar

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/