** Reply to message from Horst von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 27 Sep
2000 15:31:51 -0400
> Your problem is that you can't use anything of C++ that needs runtime
> support inside the kernel (there goes new() and friends), exception
> handling is out of the question (bye, bye, throw() et al), and (in case you
> hadn't thought of it) libstdc++ is way out of line (no fancy data
> structures or algorithms).
So what? The same is true for any operating system, and that's why driver
programmers make their own runtime. That's what I did for OS/2, and it works
great. You just create your own versions of malloc() and free() and a bunch of
other small functions that the compiler expects to be present, and link it in.
I don't see the problem.
Practically every other OS supports drivers in C++. There's nothing wrong with
writing drivers in C++, you just need to write some runtime library routines.
Your making it sound as if C++ compilers emit tons of junk that won't work in
the kernel, and that's absurd.
Nothing needs to be changed in the kernel to support C++. You just need to
write a bunch of wrappers for everything in the kernel that you use, and that's
nothing new. C++ programmers are used to this, because that's how you call any
operating system API.
--
Timur Tabi - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com
When replying to a mailing-list message, please don't cc: me, because then I'll just
get two copies of the same message.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
