On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:00:12PM +0200, Peter Osterlund wrote: > Therefore, no matter what algorithm you use in elevator_linus() the total > number of seeks should be the same. It isn't. There's a big difference between the two algorithms and all your previous emails was completly correct about the "theorical" additional seeks during starvation avoidance. > an even better way to sort the requests. I think the important thing is > trying to minimize the total amount of seek time. But doing that requires The current algorithm only tries to minimize the total amount of seek time. That's what the elevator reordering is there for. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Linus Torvalds
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Peter Osterlund
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Peter Osterlund
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jamie Lokier
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Rui Sousa
- Re: __GFP_IO && shrink_[d|i]cache_memory()? Stephen C. Tweedie