On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:11:34PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > Interesting. I haven't done any serious benching with the CSCAN introduction > in elevator_linus, I'll try that too. Only changing that the performance decreased reproducibly from 16 to 14 mbyte/sec in the read test with 2 threads. So far I'm testing only IDE with LVM striping on two equal fast disks on separate IDE channels. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Peter Osterlund
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Peter Osterlund
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jamie Lokier
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Jens Axboe
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Rui Sousa
- Re: __GFP_IO && shrink_[d|i]cache_memory()? Stephen C. Tweedie