Jeff Garzik writes: > I am glad this was mentioned... It is a valid use of __initdata for > static variables which you want to go away after boot. There might be > some wasted space lurking here and there due to un-init'd __initdata > vars. You get a compiler warning for un-init'd __initdata variables. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- how interesting are data->bss patches? Peter Samuelson
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Keith Owens
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Jeff Garzik
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches... Keith Owens
- Re: how interesting are data->bss pat... Jeff Garzik
- Re: how interesting are data->bss pat... Peter Samuelson
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches... Russell King
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Russell King
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Tigran Aivazian
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Arjan van de Ven
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Peter Samuelson
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches... Keith Owens
- Re: how interesting are data->bss pat... Peter Samuelson
- Re: how interesting are data->bs... Keith Owens