> On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 20:59:59 -0500 (CDT), > Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >(A related question: __initdata *does* have to be initialized, right?) > > If __initdata is not initialized then it ends up in the global .bss. > This would defeat the purpose of using __initdata. I am glad this was mentioned... It is a valid use of __initdata for static variables which you want to go away after boot. There might be some wasted space lurking here and there due to un-init'd __initdata vars. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- how interesting are data->bss patches? Peter Samuelson
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Keith Owens
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Jeff Garzik
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches... Keith Owens
- Re: how interesting are data->bss pat... Jeff Garzik
- Re: how interesting are data->bss pat... Peter Samuelson
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches... Russell King
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Russell King
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Tigran Aivazian
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Arjan van de Ven
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Peter Samuelson
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches... Keith Owens
- Re: how interesting are data->bss pat... Peter Samuelson