> On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 20:59:59 -0500 (CDT),
> Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >(A related question: __initdata *does* have to be initialized, right?)
>
> If __initdata is not initialized then it ends up in the global .bss.
> This would defeat the purpose of using __initdata.
I am glad this was mentioned... It is a valid use of __initdata for
static variables which you want to go away after boot. There might be
some wasted space lurking here and there due to un-init'd __initdata
vars.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- how interesting are data->bss patches? Peter Samuelson
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Keith Owens
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Jeff Garzik
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches... Keith Owens
- Re: how interesting are data->bss pat... Jeff Garzik
- Re: how interesting are data->bss pat... Peter Samuelson
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches... Russell King
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Russell King
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Tigran Aivazian
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Arjan van de Ven
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches? Peter Samuelson
- Re: how interesting are data->bss patches... Keith Owens
- Re: how interesting are data->bss pat... Peter Samuelson

