On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, M.H.VanLeeuwen wrote:
>
> Is this patch acceptable?
Please explain.
The test seems to be that "if there are IO_APICs, a PnP irq _has_ to be an
IO_APIC irq".
> + if (!IO_APIC_IRQ(irq) && io_apic_irqs)
> + return 1;
Which makes no sense to me. Why would a legacy irq not be acceptable?
Especially as they seem to be acceptable if there are _no_ IO-APIC irq's.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
