Julian Anastasov wrote: > I'm talking about test8. __SI_CODE is in 2.4, not in 2.2. > The handling is very different. We can't wait for si_code==SI_SIGIO > in 2.4 anymore. SI_SIGIO is used only in 2.2:fs/fcntl.c. 2.4 stores > POLL_xxx in si_code instead of SI_SIGIO. Why does it do that? si_band already stores the POLL_xxx code. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Julian Anastasov
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Julian Anastasov
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Chuck Lever
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Julian Anastasov
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Julian Anastasov
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Robert H. de Vries
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Julian Anastasov
- [PATCH/RFC] Fix SI_SIGIO in 2.2.17 Jamie Lokier
- [PATCH/RFC] Fix SI_SIGIO in 2.2.17 Julian Anastasov