On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 08:04:21PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > Everything looks good after test1 except the extra > '<< 16' in __SI_CODE. > > SI_SIGIO is not generated from kernel. The same is for the > other SI_ consts < 0 not defined with __SI_CODE. Ok, then you have already broken binary compatibility between 2.2 and 2.4 -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Robert H. de Vries
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Julian Anastasov
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Julian Anastasov
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Chuck Lever
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Julian Anastasov
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Julian Anastasov
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Robert H. de Vries
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Julian Anastasov
- Re: [PATCH] Fix queued SIGIO Jamie Lokier
- [PATCH/RFC] Fix SI_SIGIO in 2.2.1... Julian Anastasov