"Barry K. Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [...] > In other words, if I understand things correctly, once we have Linux > 2.4.0-test4294967296 ;) and 2.4 is stable enough for the last phase of > testing before release, 2.4.0-pre1 will be next... That so? Must get Linus an Alpha or SPARC64 ASAP so 2.4.0-test isn't unduly restricted by version numbers... -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David S. Miller
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andi Kleen
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David S. Miller
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andi Kleen
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andi Kleen
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Tom Rini
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering) Barry K. Nathan
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering) Tom Rini
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering) Horst von Brand
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering) Barry K. Nathan
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Ford
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Tom Rini
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Ford
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Russell King