According to Andre Hedrick: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > > that reducing it isn't worthwhile. The more de facto standard patches > > (*cough* NFS RAID[1] HedrickIDE *ahem*) can get into the 2.2 tree [...] > > Thanks Chip but the backporting to 2.2 has been terminated. So I've noticed. Do you not believe in its technical future, or are you just conserving what's left of your free time? -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence, but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Ralf Gerbig
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... David S. Miller
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Hubert Mantel
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Alan Cox
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Alan Cox
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Ralf Gerbig
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Andreas Bombe
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Paul Jakma
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Paul Jakma
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Pedro M. Rodrigues
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Albert D. Cahalan