On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > that reducing it isn't worthwhile. The more de facto standard patches > (*cough* NFS RAID[1] HedrickIDE *ahem*) can get into the 2.2 tree, the > easier it will be for everyone to stay up to date, and the less effort > will be wasted on basically clerical patch maintenance work. Thanks Chip but the backporting to 2.2 has been terminated. I stopped at 2.2.18-3 and would have stopped at 2.2.15-pre7 if someone had not taken the time to do it for me. Cheers, Andre Hedrick The Linux ATA/IDE guy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Mike Castle
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alexander Viro
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Ralf Gerbig
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2.2.1... Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... David S. Miller
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Hubert Mantel
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Alan Cox
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Alan Cox
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Ralf Gerbig
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Andreas Bombe
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Paul Jakma
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Paul Jakma
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Pedro M. Rodrigues