On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 03:25:35PM +0200, Tim Brunne wrote:
> Thanks for this patch. But why hasn't it been included into
> the kernel earlier? Wouldn't be a combination of yours and my
> patch be the proper way? As far as I understand you switch
> off automatic buffer flushing completely, but it should be done
> every interval of time the administrator want's it. Why do
> you think that raising the upper limits of the kernel variables
> is not suitable?
>
Would it be possible to detect when the disk spins up, and do the flush then?
Regards
Rob
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> --
> Tim Brunne | web: http://www.hmi.de/people/brunne
> Hahn-Meitner-Institut | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Glienicker Strasse 100 | office phone: +49-30-8062 2317
> D-14109 Berlin | office fax: +49-30-8062 2098
> Europe (Germany) | private phone & fax: +49-30-691 9265
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Rob Murray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
