On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > /lib/modules/<version>/.config is a big step up from the current situation > > and I'm grateful. But I do want /proc/config.gz in the kernel. > > So cat it with a magic lead in after the bzImage gzip block into the bzImage. > If you dont even know what file you are running for kernel you have other > problems anyway There are still plenty of situations where this doesn't help. Booted from unsupported USB floppy or CDROM? Netboot? Linload? ROM image? As for the >4k bug, this was a punt on my part. There should be better helper code in procfs to deal with handing out multiple pages and I didn't feel like creating it. -- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /pro... Timur Tabi
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/co... almesber
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /pro... Jan-Benedict Glaw
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /pro... almesber
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/co... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Ville Herva
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Pavel Machek
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Oliver Xymoron
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Paul Jakma
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Robert Greimel
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Paul Jakma
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Timur Tabi
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Dax Kelson
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Chris Meadors
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Keith Owens
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Timur Tabi
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Albert D. Cahalan
