Alan Cox writes: >> where you overwrite your old kernel image with a new one without >> rebooting instantly). >> >> But is it so much more expensive than a /proc/config.whatever ? > > Use that argument 50 times and your kernel has grown 100K. If I get the same level of benefit 50 times, wonderful! With /proc/config.gz, there is no need to wonder where the previous admin stored his config file. > Unfortunately everyone keeps using the argument and forgetting > the cumulative effect The effect is additive, not multiplicative. Considering the exponential nature of Moore's Law, additive bloat is no bloat at all. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config... Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config... Philipp Rumpf
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config... Philipp Rumpf
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config... Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config... Philipp Rumpf
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config... CaT
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config... Timur Tabi
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz almesber
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config... Jan-Benedict Glaw
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config... almesber
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Daniel Phillips
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Ville Herva
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Pavel Machek
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Oliver Xymoron
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Paul Jakma
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Robert Greimel
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Paul Jakma
- Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz Timur Tabi