Re: GPL violations: make it harder

[Andreas Dilger]

Brian Hayward writes:
> I also think it's a logical conclusion that a patch to a GPL'd program is
> released under the GPL - even if you don't specifically say so.

Actually, this totally makes sense, because a patch contains "context" lines
and therefore includes GPL code in it - hence it MUST be under the GPL if it
is redistributed.

Cheers, Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/