On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> In fact, I plan to spend most of my time trying to track down
> the 2 VM problems on tytso's list:
>
> 1) the innd data corruption bug
This, I think, was due to a bug in ext2 truncate. If so, it should be
fixed in test8-pre2.
Al, I think you said you could create the innd problem, and that your fix
fixed it. Correct?
> 2) system hangs with 0 free low memory and some free
> high memory
>
> The lru_cache_add() BUG() seems to be defanged for now and
> isn't very high priority to me...
I'd like to know what it was. Last I heard, it was still the case of
"pages just off the freelist had some bits set that they shouldn't have".
That makes me nervous.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Chris Evans
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Mike Galbraith
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Ari Pollak
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Ari Pollak
- 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrati... bert hubert
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about ... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ab... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Henrik St�rner
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Henrik St�rner
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Linus Torvalds

