On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > In fact, I plan to spend most of my time trying to track down > the 2 VM problems on tytso's list: > > 1) the innd data corruption bug This, I think, was due to a bug in ext2 truncate. If so, it should be fixed in test8-pre2. Al, I think you said you could create the innd problem, and that your fix fixed it. Correct? > 2) system hangs with 0 free low memory and some free > high memory > > The lru_cache_add() BUG() seems to be defanged for now and > isn't very high priority to me... I'd like to know what it was. Last I heard, it was still the case of "pages just off the freelist had some bits set that they shouldn't have". That makes me nervous. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Chris Evans
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Mike Galbraith
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Ari Pollak
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Ari Pollak
- 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrati... bert hubert
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about ... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ab... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Henrik Størner
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Henrik Størner
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Linus Torvalds