On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Not really. I'm not aware of any bug with my VM that doesn't > occur in the standard VM too. So what happened with the BUG() thing that you had? I never saw any resolution to that, and that certainly didn't happen with the standard VM. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Mark Hahn
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Chris Evans
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Mike Galbraith
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Ari Pollak
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad Ari Pollak
- 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about inte... bert hubert
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ab... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad ... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is q... Henrik Størner
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is q... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is q... Henrik Størner
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is q... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is q... Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is q... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is q... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is q... Linus Torvalds