On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 11:27:17AM +0100, Matthew Kirkwood wrote: > > - if ( !suser () ) return -EPERM; > > + if ( !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ) return -EPERM; > > Please think further about these random changes. CAP_SYS_ADMIN > is already bloated with useless junk and these aren't helping > the situation. > > These cases in mtrr.c are clearly CAP_SYS_RAWIO. Clearly? How do MTRR changes relate to rawio ? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Richard Gooch
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Chris Evans
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Richard Gooch
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Richard Gooch
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Chris Evans
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capab... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capab... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capab... Matthew Kirkwood